--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
15:13 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESO
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
14:51 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
14:50 ---
Subject: Bug 16782
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-28 14:50:18
Modified files:
gcc/cp : decl.c ChangeLog
gcc/testsui
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
23:37 ---
We have consensus to change this to a pedwarn by default; I'll take care of
that.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-09-15 21:39 ---
Sounds like we're in violent agreement, then.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16782
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-09-15 19:33 ---
Subject: Re: Accepts qualified member function declaration in class
"jason at redhat dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Subject: Re: Accepts qualified member function declaration
| in class
|
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2005-09-15 17:50
---
Subject: Re: Accepts qualified member function declaration
in class
dank at kegel dot com wrote:
> gcc-4.1 had a stated goal of giving every warning a name,
> and letting them be turned on and off individually.
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-09-15 16:49 ---
We build everything with -Werror so errors are flagged as
fatal. If we added -pedantic, we'd have to stop using
-Werror, and implement the fatal error check ourselves in
a wrapper, which would be a huge pain.
gcc-4.
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2005-09-15 14:23
---
Subject: Re: Accepts qualified member function declaration
in class
I wouldn't mind turning this diagnostic on by default as a pedwarn. As
usual, people who want their code to build anyway can use -fpermissive
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-09-15 13:11 ---
Also, the non-gcc compiler we're trying our code with supports
some but not all gnuisms, so -pedantic would actually cause
us to fix much more of our code than is practically neccessary
for the kind of portability we
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-09-15 13:09 ---
Pain. We have a very large application, and we cannot
afford to fix all the warnings -pedantic gives.
This is another case of "we want to turn on and off individual warnings,
please".
We're getting mighty tired of
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
13:04 ---
Dan, why can't you use -pedantic? That's the best way of avoiding gnuisms.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16782
--- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com 2005-09-15 12:39 ---
I would dearly love to be able to say -Woverzealous-qualification
or something like that to turn on this warning.
It would make keeping our code portable much easier.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
08:59 ---
A pedwarn might be the way to go, but I don't feel strongly about it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16782
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-09-14 23:04 ---
Subject: Re: Accepts qualified member function declaration in class
"mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| G++ will issue a diagnostic about this usage with -pedantic.
|
| T
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-09-14 22:57
---
Well, we've been tightening the compiler in many places. I consider this
a particularly useless extension -- it's true that it doesn't hurt anyone,
but it adds nothing whatsoever of value to the language. I wo
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14
22:43 ---
G++ will issue a diagnostic about this usage with -pedantic.
The decision not to issue a diagnostic in the default mode is conscious and
intentional; G++ has historically accepted this code, and there is n
17 matches
Mail list logo
