[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

2019-11-21 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168 --- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Oren Ben-Kiki from comment #10) > All good points, which you could say about many opened bugs. > > The `-Weffc++` flag is a useful tool to keep large code bases working, even > when written by

[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

2014-01-10 Thread gcc-o...@ben-kiki.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168 --- Comment #10 from Oren Ben-Kiki --- All good points, which you could say about many opened bugs. The `-Weffc++` flag is a useful tool to keep large code bases working, even when written by less-than-guru C++ programmers. As someone tending a l

[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

2014-01-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to oren from comment #8) > I think it is reasonable to expect that as long as -Weffc++ is in the > compiler, it should make sense, and this specific behavior doesn't. If it > has other flaws, well

[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

2014-01-10 Thread o...@ben-kiki.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168 --- Comment #8 from o...@ben-kiki.org --- Well... it does provide some really useful stuff. I think it is reasonable to expect that as long as -Weffc++ is in the compiler, it should make sense, and this specific behavior doesn't. If it has other f

[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

2014-01-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Oren Ben-Kiki from comment #6) > This still occurs in 4.8.2, and is an extremely annoying issue; it makes > -Weffc++ very difficult to apply to a code base. So don't use -Weffc++ then. It's fla

[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

2014-01-10 Thread gcc-o...@ben-kiki.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168 Oren Ben-Kiki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc-o...@ben-kiki.org --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

2012-01-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-06-28 01:34:16 |2012-01-05 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

2012-01-05 Thread f-roth at megaera dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16168 --- Comment #4 from Frederick Roth 2012-01-05 15:55:30 UTC --- this still happens with version 4.6.2. Can someone reconfirm this?

[Bug c++/16168] -Weffc++ item 14 improvements

2005-03-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|2004-12-28 01:41:09 |2005-03-29 01:49:04 date|