https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I guess because nobody asked for it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
Ben Elliston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 26 21:28:08 2014
New Revision: 208183
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208183&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59231
PR c++/11586
PR c++/14710
PR c++/57132
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
--- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-19 15:51:36 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Mar 19 15:51:25 2012
New Revision: 185524
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185524
Log:
2012-03-16 Paolo Carlini
PR c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo.carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2012-03-14
18:00:33 UTC ---
I wouldn't warn about a cast that changes the type or value category of an
expression at all, or a cast that ends up being the same type as the result of
template instantiation. But a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-14
11:47:30 UTC ---
Indeed, I was vaguely considering similar things..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-14
10:52:18 UTC ---
I can see some value in the base class case too, but whether it's useless
depends on context, here the exact same casts are not redundant because they
select between two overloads:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
10 matches
Mail list logo
