--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 02:28
---
As Roger says, this not a bug. Roger's analysis is spot on. (For reference,
EDG also rejects this program.)
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-03-28 23:09 ---
Ignore my last comment. The type matters, and what is needed is indeed a
constant of _integer_ type, but enumerators are not of integer type.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14644
--- Comment #3 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-03-28 23:01 ---
But [expr.const] also says:
An integral constant-expression can involve only literals (2.13), enumerators,
...
Thus enumerators are also integral constant expressions. The distinction
between integral and enumeration is on
--- Comment #2 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-03-28 21:46 ---
I believe that this may not be a g++ bug. The wording of the standard is:
[conv.ptr] An null pointer constant is an *integral* constant expression
(_expr.const_) rvalue of integer type that evaluates to zero.
Ignoring th
