https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120390
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There's also the source context which should be pretty clear what the assertion
was testing when it failed:
188 | static_assert(is_destructible<_Value_type>::value,
But I think the best solution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120390
--- Comment #3 from nightstrike ---
I know it isn't a bug, it's bad code that the compiler is correctly erroring
out on. My point is that the original error message was spot on perfect in
highlighting the issue being that the destructor was pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120390
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120390
--- Comment #1 from nightstrike ---
(In reply to nightstrike from comment #0)
> either 1) I was missing private:,
"missing public:", obviously
