[Bug c++/119201] Wrong plural forms in "missing primary template attribute"

2025-03-11 Thread roland.illig at gmx dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119201 Roland Illig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/119201] Wrong plural forms in "missing primary template attribute"

2025-03-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119201 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (n>=2 && n<=4) actually for the second case, I've mistakenly pasted Polish form.

[Bug c++/119201] Wrong plural forms in "missing primary template attribute"

2025-03-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119201 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, now that I think again about this, I think what we have in the sources is right, at least for Czech. Where inform_n (i.e. ngettext under the hood) should be used is if the wording said "missing %d pr