[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer since r15-6339-g40f243e9179667

2025-01-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer since r15-6339-g40f243e9179667

2025-01-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3191d7404bb9c2f53554d7c7f50dfb73b5a78726 commit r15-6958-g3191d7404bb9c2f53554d7c7f50dfb73b5a78726 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer since r15-6339-g40f243e9179667

2024-12-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer since r15-6339-g40f243e9179667

2024-12-27 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- Thank you jakub. Keeping trunk working is appreciated and makes things a lot easier for testing

[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer since r15-6339-g40f243e9179667

2024-12-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer since r15-6339-g40f243e9179667

2024-12-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- I see add_function_candidate calling 2570 t = implicit_conversion (parmtype, argtype, arg, 2571 /*c_cast_p=*/false, lflags, complain); where arg is

[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer since r15-6339-g40f243e9179667

2024-12-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-12-27 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer since r15-6339-g40f243e9179667

2024-12-26 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[15 regression] OpenTTD |[15 regression] OpenTTD |

[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer

2024-12-26 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- No, still fails

[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer

2024-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Does removing the trailing comma fix the issue?

[Bug c++/118214] [15 regression] OpenTTD test failure with C++ large initializer

2024-12-26 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118214 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0