https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I have a fix for the ranger code; this is not a fix for the diagnostic
issue mentioned here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note without LTO we get the correct function name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Pretty sure yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does this show up only with LTO?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the fix for the warning should be:
range_operator *m_range_tree[RANGE_OP_TABLE_SIZE]{}; in range-op.h.
That is value initialize m_range_tree which was not done before hand.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116208
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |c++
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski