https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116099
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ha, so because it doesn't know what `const Oops` is, g++ applies the
implicit-int rule and decides it's `const int Oops` i.e. a non-type template
parameter, but that's invalid because `template struct S` i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116099
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116099
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I didn't find a match for the "ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'type name' with
no type" text, but we certainly have some bugs about implicit int causing bad
recovery.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116099
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This might be a dup ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116099
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For comparison, Clang also doesn't give consistent errors:
x.cc:3:3: error: use of undeclared identifier 'Oops'
3 | S o;
| ^
x.cc:4:9: error: unknown type name 'Oops'
4 | S oo;
|
