https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109775
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||61259
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109775
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is another related testcase:
```
typedef int T;
void naimul(const T v_[2])
{
int i = 0;
T pp(T(v_[0])+0);
}
```
We get an -pedantic-error dealing with 0 sized array:
: In function 'void naimul(const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109775
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-08
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109775
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 55022
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55022&action=edit
Non reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109775
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It has to do with parsing here:
GCC starts parsing it as a function declaration and then backs out but had
already warned/errored out about the VLA.
If you change the code to:
D const pp{D(v_[i]) * o.v_[S -
