[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-17 Thread peter at meraki dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 --- Comment #13 from Peter Hurley --- Thanks everyone! We're really grateful for the rapid response and backports! Happy holidays!

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-16 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.0|10.5 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16605ad9b1e1a6c5aab2c98b5b0f995285584f81 commit r10-11124-g16605ad9b1e1a6c5aab2c98b5b0f995285584f81 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71d2567a678b01a3a59064d22e0f9165be9e93c3 commit r11-10424-g71d2567a678b01a3a59064d22e0f9165be9e93c3 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-16 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > I think it was fixed by the patch which fixed/improved PR 102780: > r12-4769-g9927ecbb42d5b I can confirm this!

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-12-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Just for the record, since nobody seems to have said it yet, the slowdown is independent of the -std option. GCC 8 is fast even with -std=gnu++17 (instead of the default gnu++14) and GCC 11 is slow even wi

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/108138] g++ 9+ takes 7-10x longer compiling constexpr

2022-12-15 Thread peter at meraki dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108138 --- Comment #1 from Peter Hurley --- Created attachment 54108 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54108&action=edit testcase header file