https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to jo.rickert from comment #6)
> Thanks, I thought the name had to be unique per translation unit.
That can't possibly work. You would have to define the entire program in one
translation unit,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Eric Schmidt from comment #5)
> Surely this should have been resolved as INVALID?
It was marked as won't fix as I am saying we won't fix (change) the compiler to
reject it (even though the code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #6 from jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> You can read up more on the one definition rule here:
> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/definition
>
> It is a good summary of what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
Eric Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric41293 at comcast dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
You can read up more on the one definition rule here:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/definition
It is a good summary of what the standard says.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #2 from jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch ---
The forgotten command line:
g++ -o main main.cpp dummy.cpp undefined_behavior.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
jo.rickert at protonmail dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.3.1, 12.2.0, 4.8.5
