https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks for the fixes, uses the new built-ins since
r16-1077-gb32bf304793047
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
*** Bug 120504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d287bff14885598c75c1cb16b08e0ba4ba05bce
commit r16-1063-g3d287bff14885598c75c1cb16b08e0ba4ba05bce
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
These were working before, but fail after r16-1054
static_assert( __is_destructible(int&) );
static_assert( __is_destructible(int&&) );
static_assert( __is_destructible(int(&)[1]) );
static_assert( __is_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a42538f9693a6608bb733860adec75a691f1940
commit r16-1053-g8a42538f9693a6608bb733860adec75a691f1940
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7f33a35bffe7b331b0f8475e52c2dcc1c5d2ea8
commit r16-1054-gd7f33a35bffe7b331b0f8475e52c2dcc1c5d2ea8
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 61560
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61560&action=edit
regression fixes
Thanks, now testing these fixes for those three issues:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And for this type but I haven't figured out why:
#include
static_assert( __is_destructible(std::error_category) );
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The new built-in seems wrong for function types:
static_assert( not __is_destructible(int()) );
static_assert( not __is_nothrow_destructible(int()) );
static_assert( not __is_trivially_destructible(int())
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This regressed the following testcase:
struct X;
template
struct default_delete
{
void operator()(T*) { static_assert(sizeof(T), "type is not incomplete"); }
};
template>
struct unique_ptr
{
~unique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0629924777ea20d56d9ea40c3915eb0327a22ac7
commit r16-944-g0629924777ea20d56d9ea40c3915eb0327a22ac7
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2022-11-10 00:00:00 |2025-5-28
--- Comment #3 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I committed r13-3870-g0cbb756fe9c8e1 to speed up the std::destructible concept,
so an intrinsic is not urgent. But it would probably be even better than the
new implementation, and would also help other pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107600
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And as with the others, __is_nothrow_destructible, which is what the concepts
depend on specifically:
/// [concept.destructible], concept destructible
template
concept destructible = is_nothrow_de
17 matches
Mail list logo
