https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107555
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Boris Kolpackov from comment #6)
> I was under the impression that only something runnable would be useful, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need
> if all that's need is a preprocessed translat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107555
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107555
--- Comment #6 from Boris Kolpackov ---
I was under the impression that only something runnable would be useful, but if
all that's need is a preprocessed translation unit, then that's no problem at
all. I've also attached the translation unit wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107555
--- Comment #5 from Boris Kolpackov ---
Created attachment 53850
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53850&action=edit
Preprocessed translation unit with workaround
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107555
--- Comment #4 from Boris Kolpackov ---
Created attachment 53849
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53849&action=edit
Preprocessed translation unit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107555
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Just the preprocessed .ii file for the one translation unit compile-rule.cxx is
all that's needed.
The bug reporting instructions don't say you have to minimise it (though that's
certainly preferred) but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107555
--- Comment #2 from Boris Kolpackov ---
There is a way to reproduce it but it requires building the actual source code
rather than a minimal reproducer. It's not that difficult. Should I provide the
instructions?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
