https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-09-05
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4)
> Could you double check again on an updated trunk?
Problem seems to have gone away on today's trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Yeah, that's all me.
I can't reproduce on x86-64, but there's been a couple patches in this area
over the weekend. Could you double check again on an updated trunk?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
After more than 13 hours of reduction, the C++ code seems to be:
using int32 = int;
using int64 = long;
float NoWeight___trans_tmp_2;
int ShortestPath_distance;
struct FloatWeightTpl {
FloatWeightTpl(fl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106824
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
It seems that flag -O2 can be reduced to -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations.
