https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54bccc8e05f6f9480b50c4edfb2a364d344e72c0
commit r9-10141-g54bccc8e05f6f9480b50c4edfb2a364d344e72c0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:125234a3b78138e22112bb3f207df987817b6818
commit r10-10698-g125234a3b78138e22112bb3f207df987817b6818
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51b5fa6b4257850c99094f2cf7ece949b00a7826
commit r11-9734-g51b5fa6b4257850c99094f2cf7ece949b00a7826
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72124f487ccb5c8065dd5f7b8fba254600b7e611
commit r12-7793-g72124f487ccb5c8065dd5f7b8fba254600b7e611
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52657&action=edit
gcc12-pr104994.patch
Untested fix. This anticipates that CWG. If we wouldn't, we should
temporarily revert t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> We might have a defect in the
> current draft, because it seems to forbid it.
Oh, which Hubert already filed:
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2552.ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ville says that P2242 did not intend to add new restrictions, so this was valid
in C++20, and should still be valid in C++23 even if control flow passes over
that non-local declaration. We might have a def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
10 matches
Mail list logo