https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103618
--- Comment #3 from Maik Urbannek ---
The `constexpr` in the main function is not necessary to produce the warning.
The Function foo has to be constexpr. 'inline' or 'static' (before the
function) does not produce the warning.
Maybe `constexp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103618
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is a strange one. If that overflow happened during constant evaluation, it
would be ill-formed. And none of the lines mentioned in the diagnostics have
any pointer arithmetic at all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103618
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
