https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103499
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p.cross13 at yahoo dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103499
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103499
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14979dd31c887ba5ba573f2cdb0647b37e09641a
commit r14-5461-g14979dd31c887ba5ba573f2cdb0647b37e09641a
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103499
--- Comment #6 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
The relationship I was thinking of was that, without this
being fixed, the full set of header units for the standard
library probably could not be completed: a b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103499
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-05
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103499
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bmlushma at uwaterloo dot ca
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103499
--- Comment #3 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #2 and #1)
Since my example shows that std::is_nothrow_constructible_v<. . .>
can run into the problem, adding bugzilla 99227 ("[meta] [modules]
Bugs relating to header
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103499
--- Comment #2 from Mark Millard ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #1)
> // g++12 -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -xc++ -c gpp12_module_iostream_failure.cppm
> // g++12 -freport-bug -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -c
> gpp12_module_iostream_failure.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103499
Mark Millard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markmigm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
