[Bug c++/103478] Possible regression in constexpr processing

2021-11-30 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103478 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/103478] Possible regression in constexpr processing

2021-11-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103478 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-30 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/103478] Possible regression in constexpr processing

2021-11-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103478 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #2 from Andrew P

[Bug c++/103478] Possible regression in constexpr processing

2021-11-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103478 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- arguments to constexpr functions are not valid template arguments.