https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102932
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Rajpal Singh from comment #3)
> Thanks ! Yes, it's signed integer overflow, is there any way to catch it
> statically at compile time ?
Not really because there would so many false positives, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102932
--- Comment #3 from Rajpal Singh ---
(In reply to Tee KOBAYASHI from comment #1)
> Signed integer overflow. You can use -fwrapv.
Thanks ! Yes, it's signed integer overflow, is there any way to catch it
statically at compile time ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102932
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102932
Tee KOBAYASHI changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xtkoba at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
