https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102916
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Darrell Wright from comment #3)
> > Also http://eel.is/c++draft/library#constexpr.functions-1
> >
> > An issue is that it's high level observable a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102916
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Darrell Wright from comment #3)
> Also http://eel.is/c++draft/library#constexpr.functions-1
>
> An issue is that it's high level observable and not just an optimization
http://www.open-std.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102916
--- Comment #3 from Darrell Wright ---
Also http://eel.is/c++draft/library#constexpr.functions-1
An issue is that it's high level observable and not just an optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102916
--- Comment #2 from Darrell Wright ---
The constexpr value returned is different depending on the compiler. If one
uses clang and gcc this leads to an ODR issue as
void bar( ) {
if constexpr( foo<[]{ return std::sqrt( 4.0 ); }>( ) ) {
d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102916
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
> this can lead to ODR issues
I don't think it can the C++ standard allows a compiler to have an extended
const expressions IIRC.
