https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
hmm let me see if I can reproduce this (I didn't see it in my earlier tests):
.L41:
ud2
test():
ret
which would make things look somewhat strange indeed (the functions are all
TU-local - so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
note I looked at master (trunk) and 11.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Mathias Stearn from comment #0)
> https://godbolt.org/z/aoab9W4xG
>
> This should all compile away, and test() should just be a single ret
> instruction. That is not what happens now, even w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
--- Comment #1 from Mathias Stearn ---
Sorry, there was a typo in the initial code. I forgot the trivial
implementation of await_resume(). (D'oh!)
Now I can see that test() is just a ret instruction, but there is still a lot
of dead code emitte
