https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e43f47686980e9d0081aa765b619bdc89189b51a
commit r11-8448-ge43f47686980e9d0081aa765b619bdc89189b51a
Author: Andreas Krebb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:720dff974ea0487c35c0a4bfa527f30df5066ce1
commit r12-857-g720dff974ea0487c35c0a4bfa527f30df5066ce1
Author: Andreas Krebbel
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50685|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
This is a hard requirement for the z/TPF operating system supported as part of
our IBM Z backend. It happens to work for many years already and they make
extensive use of it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
That said, use integer types.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I don't think different sized pointers are properly handled anywhere. It may
just happen to "work". Why would you need such beasts? There's only one
intptr_t and only one POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED, only o
