[Bug bootstrap/92783] [10 regression] SEGV in field_byte_offset

2019-12-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92783 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/92783] [10 regression] SEGV in field_byte_offset

2019-12-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92783 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Dec 3 23:10:46 2019 New Revision: 278948 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278948&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/92783 * gcc-interface/utils.c (rest_of_re

[Bug bootstrap/92783] [10 regression] SEGV in field_byte_offset

2019-12-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92783 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ebotcazou at

[Bug bootstrap/92783] [10 regression] SEGV in field_byte_offset

2019-12-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92783 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/92783] [10 regression] SEGV in field_byte_offset

2019-12-03 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92783 --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou --- > No patch in that range is immediately obvious, so I'll have to run a reghunt. Probably r278930 though.

[Bug bootstrap/92783] [10 regression] SEGV in field_byte_offset

2019-12-03 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92783 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0