https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg00576.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg00522.html for details.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That changed in PR79565 / PR82483, but I'm afraid I don't remember that change
much. Guess it has something to do with the patterns using V2SImode which
wasn't enabled when MMX was disabled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Why do we have
define_expand "sse2_umulv1siv1di3"
[(set (match_operand:V1DI 0 "register_operand")
(mult:V1DI
(zero_extend:V1DI
(vec_select:V1SI
(match_operand:V2SI 1 "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri May 17 14:48:37 2019
New Revision: 271328
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271328&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Enable MMX intrinsics without SSE/SSE2/SSSE3
Since MMX intri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looks good on i686-linux, results in
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr90497-2.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr90497-2.c:11:10: warning:
implicit declaratio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46362|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/jakub/src/gcc/obj45/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj45/gcc/ -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fno-diagnostics-show-line-numbers -fdiagnostics-color=never -O2
-Werror-implicit-function-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With that patch what previously failed bootstrap passes it now.
Compared to a build from 24 hours ago and ignoring FAILs introduces during that
time also on x86_64-linux, I see:
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/3dnow-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
BTW, I'd fear that with system GCC 10, one won't be able to build any earlier
GCCs unless patching libcpp/lex.c :(.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
12 matches
Mail list logo
