https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #99 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Jun 3 19:13:46 2019
New Revision: 271881
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271881&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin, backport fixes for PR 89864 (with 90379 included)
2019-06-03 Iain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #98 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Jun 1 07:41:06 2019
New Revision: 271834
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271834&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Darwin - backport fix for PR bootstrap/89864
2019-06-01 Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||townsend at astro dot wisc.edu
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
Bug 89864 depends on bug 90379, which changed state.
Bug 90379 Summary: Gcc 9.1 fails "make check" on linux due to missing
MacOS-specific header file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90379
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #96 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon May 13 20:37:08 2019
New Revision: 271136
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271136&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
backport fix for PR90379
2019-05-13 Iain Sandoe
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #95 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat May 11 20:19:31 2019
New Revision: 271098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271098&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fixincludes - fix PR90379
One should not provide test_text for wrap style
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #94 from Zaak ---
OK, great. I was confused by the target changing from 9.1 to 9.2. Thanks!
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 10:11 AM iains at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #93 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #91)
> GCC 9.1 has been released.
(In reply to Zaak from comment #92)
> Is my interpretation correct that the patch did not make it in time for GCC
> 9.1? (I( want to ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #92 from Zaak ---
Is my interpretation correct that the patch did not make it in time for GCC
9.1? (I( want to make sure we're applying it in Homebrew if not.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2
--- Comment #91 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #90 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Zaak from comment #89)
> Anyone have a patch for 4.9? A user wants one, but I can't build 4.9 from
> source on Mojave.
4.9is long-closed [as are 5, 6] , is there some reason the user can't move
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #89 from Zaak ---
Anyone have a patch for 4.9? A user wants one, but I can't build 4.9 from
source on Mojave.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #88 from Iain Sandoe ---
unless some problem shows up, this is what I will commit to 8.3 (limited
checking only).
https://github.com/iains/gcc-8-branch/commit/235ccac0aeb941c860c1e469a645ab9a90c9eca2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #87 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Zaak from comment #86)
> > (In reply to fink from comment #85)
> >
> > Zaak,
> > I have patches for Fink for gcc5-gcc8 release tarballs. I'm waiting for the
> > gcc5 build to finish before I make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #86 from Zaak ---
> (In reply to fink from comment #85)
>
> Zaak,
> I have patches for Fink for gcc5-gcc8 release tarballs. I'm waiting for the
> gcc5 build to finish before I make a public commit, which should be tonight.
Thanks! I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #85 from fink at snaggledworks dot com ---
(In reply to Zaak from comment #84)
> Ian, Jurgen, et al.,
>
> Thanks for your hard work getting the patch created and validated!
>
> I'm a mac Homebrew maintainer, and was hoping to get a p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #84 from Zaak ---
Ian, Jurgen, et al.,
Thanks for your hard work getting the patch created and validated!
I'm a mac Homebrew maintainer, and was hoping to get a patch into the GCC-8
formula sooner rather than later as this Xcode reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #83 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #81)
> LLVM worked, so I think there are enough green lights now for committing
> this fix.
yeah, I had a few tests of my own to complete.
So - fixed on trunk
back por
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #82 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Thu Apr 18 06:53:21 2019
New Revision: 270435
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270435&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix PR89864
2019-04-18 Erik Schnetter
Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #81 from Jürgen Reuter ---
LLVM worked, so I think there are enough green lights now for committing this
fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #80 from Jürgen Reuter ---
> A little late to the party, but this revised patch worked for me on
> 10.4.4/Xcode10.2 with gcc8.3.0, gcc7.4.0, and gcc6.5.0. fftw3-3.3.8 built
> and passed all tests against the patched gcc8 and gcc7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #79 from fink at snaggledworks dot com ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #68)
> Created attachment 46176 [details]
> revised fixincludes patch.
>
> So I have an answer about the language implications.
>
> Any C++ program cont
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #78 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #77)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #76)
> > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #75)
>
> > > LLVM does not compile, but I
> > > guess this is unrelated to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #77 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #76)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #75)
> > LLVM does not compile, but I
> > guess this is unrelated to the problem here:
> > [ 38%] Building CXX object
> > l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #76 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #75)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #74)
>
> > Thanks, does that include a test suite run and/or building something
> > substantial (e.g. LLVM)? .. sorry to pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #75 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #74)
> Thanks, does that include a test suite run and/or building something
> substantial (e.g. LLVM)? .. sorry to pass this on, but right now as noted,
> very limited
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #74 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #73)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #68)
> > Created attachment 46176 [details]
> > revised fixincludes patch.
>
> >
> > The patch attached include the genera
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #73 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #68)
> Created attachment 46176 [details]
> revised fixincludes patch.
>
> The patch attached include the generated files, and I'd be grateful if folks
> would test it
29 matches
Mail list logo
