https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89829
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89829
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Mar 28 08:44:44 2019
New Revision: 269985
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269985&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert r254150 (PR bootstrap/89829).
2019-03-28 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89829
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Serge Belyshev from comment #2)
> On the other hand, benchmarking shows that better training brings no
> advantage. Or rather, slight measurable regression is apparent:
>
> option| t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89829
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89829
--- Comment #2 from Serge Belyshev ---
On the other hand, benchmarking shows that better training brings no advantage.
Or rather, slight measurable regression is apparent:
option| training dataset| benchmark | compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89829
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|