[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-12-08 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-12-08 Thread hainque at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #16 from Olivier Hainque --- Author: hainque Date: Fri Dec 8 09:33:08 2017 New Revision: 255501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255501&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-06-08 Tristan Gingold PR ada/81470 * dwarf2o

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-12-06 Thread hainque at adacore dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #15 from hainque at adacore dot com --- And thanks Rainer for having confirmed that it resolves the problem for you as well. > On Dec 6, 2017, at 23:54 , hainque at adacore dot com > wrote: > >>> Confirmed, this patch solves the i

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-12-06 Thread hainque at adacore dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #14 from hainque at adacore dot com --- > On Dec 6, 2017, at 21:16 , rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de > wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 >> >> Confirmed, this patch solves the issue. >> >> Thanks > > Olivi

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-12-06 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #13 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Rainer Emrich from comment #12) > (In reply to Olivier Hainque from comment #11) > > Comment on attachment 42747 [details] > > don't emit .cfi_personality/.cfi_lsda for !dwarf2 eh > > > > >diff

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-30 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Olivier Hainque from comment #11) > Comment on attachment 42747 [details] > don't emit .cfi_personality/.cfi_lsda for !dwarf2 eh > > >diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c > >index 3d6

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-30 Thread hainque at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 Olivier Hainque changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #42747|[patch] don't emit |don't emit description|.cfi_per

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-29 Thread hainque at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #10 from Olivier Hainque --- Created attachment 42747 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42747&action=edit [patch] don't emit .cfi_personality/.cfi_lsda for !dwarf2 eh We had a patch for something of this kind we ha

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-28 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7) > And what's the output of 'gcc -v' for the base compiler? Same gcc without ada: $ /opt/devel/gnu/gcc/MINGW_NT/x86_64-w64-mingw32/mingw-w64-runtime-trunk-svn/gcc-8

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-27 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- And what's the output of 'gcc -v' for the base compiler?

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #5) > r247301 is the switch to native exceptions for the compiler proper and we > know that this works on 64-bit Windows. How do you configure the compiler? ../../../

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-27 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-27 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Emrich --- Unfortunately the issue persists. There are even more failures. Comparing stages 2 and 3 Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/ada/ali-util.o differs gcc/ada/ali.o differs gcc/ada/bindgen.o differs gcc/ada/b_gna

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-24 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Is this still a problem? At least on x86_64-linux many people have done > many successful bootstraps with ada since then. I will test next week, when I find the

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-11-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-07-19 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/81470] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failures in gcc/ada

2017-07-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0