https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #26 from Iain Sandoe ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Jun 13 07:55:05 2015
New Revision: 224451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
PR bootstrap/66448
* passes.c (rest_of_decl_compilati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #24)
> I still see
> with the patches in comments 17 and 20. What am I missing?
IIRC, the patch at comment #17 includes the original "lazy creation" of the
exte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I still see
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/const-cfstring-1.mm -O0 -fnext-runtime
(test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/const-cfstring-1.mm -O0
-fnext-runtime compil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #23 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Thu Jun 11 20:46:46 2015
New Revision: 224393
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224393&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/66448
* dwarf2out.c (check_die): Check for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #21)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #20)
> > + && DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl) != BUILTINS_LOCATION
>
> This seems reasonable.
My testing completed succes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #21 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #20)
> + && DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl) != BUILTINS_LOCATION
This seems reasonable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe ---
FWIW,
I boostrapped r224366 with the dwarf2out.c changes + this:
diff --git a/gcc/passes.c b/gcc/passes.c
index d3ffe33..1bc8a36 100644
--- a/gcc/passes.c
+++ b/gcc/passes.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ rest_of_decl_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #18)
> > Could you test it properly on darwin?
>
> $ grep -rH "invalid DW" gcc/testsuite |wc -l
> 0
Confirmed on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with
--enable-langu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #17)
> Created attachment 35744 [details]
> Call check_die on type DIEs and avoid DW_AT_aritificial attribs
>
> >> I can't reproduce any of these with a cross compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35734|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 35739
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35739&action=edit
outputs from -save-temps on 20020412-1.c (-O3 -g)
.. of course, we might just have uncovered some latent issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #14)
> Created attachment 35734 [details]
> Patch to ICE on other duplicate DW_AT_ attributes
> I can't reproduce any of these with a cross compiler. I'm building a c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 35734
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35734&action=edit
Patch to ICE on other duplicate DW_AT_ attributes
On 06/09/2015 08:00 AM, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 9 14:51:30 2015
New Revision: 224285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/66448
* toplev.c (check_global_declaration):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #11)
> (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #10)
> > It's not supposed to. It's for issue three as stated.
>
> The test suite is running - was going to wait to report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #10)
> It's not supposed to. It's for issue three as stated.
indeed;
state as of now is that (with both proposed patches in place and
--disable-werror), the multiple D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez ---
It's not supposed to. It's for issue three as stated.
On Jun 9, 2015 4:36 AM, "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr"
wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
>
> --- Comment #9 from Dominique d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 35718
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35718&action=edit
> Tentative patch for issue #3
The patch does not fix the
../../work/gcc/ipa-pure-const.c:1636:1: e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 35718
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35718&action=edit
Tentative patch for issue #3
Regarding the Darwin ld64 warnings, I found one instance of a local static DIE
wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 35717
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35717&action=edit
pre-proc file for ipa-pure-const.c
svn rev. 224236 + patch to defer declaration of the extern.
If this is an iss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merril
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I don't have access to a Darwin box. Could you provide a preprocessed file so I
can try to reproduce the defined but not used problem on a cross build?
Also, what triplet?
Thanks.
On Jun 7, 2015 4:09 AM,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #2)
> > > 2. Once (1) is fixed, bootstrap then fails with:
> > >
> > > /GCC/gcc-trunk/gcc/ipa-pure-const.c:1640:1: error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #2)
> > 2. Once (1) is fixed, bootstrap then fails with:
> >
> > /GCC/gcc-trunk/gcc/ipa-pure-const.c:1640:1: error:
> > ‘{anonymous}::pass_ipa_pure_const::pass_ipa_pu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin14 |*-apple-darwin*
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 35710
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35710&action=edit
declare "extern int __CFConstantStringClassReference" lazily
There seem to be three issues triggered by 224161
1
31 matches
Mail list logo
