https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
Thanks, Richard!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Aug 29 15:51:13 2014
New Revision: 214733
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214733&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/62301
* rtlanal.c (rtx_referen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Ah...I've been staring at the two versions for so long and that never leaped
out at me. :) Thanks, Richard!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Unfortunately that was not sufficient -- same SEGVs are still occurring.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Looks like a subtle logic change in the patch:
+ FOR_EACH_SUBRTX (iter, array, body, ALL)
+if (const_rtx y = *iter)
+ {
+ /* Check if a label_ref Y refers to label X. */
+ if (GET_CODE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Example backtrace for segv:
#0 0x4d5a28a0 in ?? ()
#1 0x10370128 in mem_loc_descriptor(rtx_def*, machine_mode,
machine_mode, var_init_status) ()
#2 0x103704f4 in mem_loc_descriptor(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Summary|PowerPC bootstra