[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #18 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-09 09:47:51 UTC --- Fixed again on 4.7 branch by #including "output.h" in lto.c.

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #17 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-09 08:17:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > I didn't notice that my backport to 4.7 caused: > > ../../gcc-svn/branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/lto/lto.c:1060:68: warning: format > ‘%wx’ expects argument o

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-09 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #16 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-09 08:02:22 UTC --- I didn't notice that my backport to 4.7 caused: ../../gcc-svn/branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/lto/lto.c:1060:68: warning: format ‘%wx’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argumen

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-07 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-07 19:18:40 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Feb 7 19:18:27 2013 New Revision: 195865 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195865 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-07 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-07 18:02:00 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Feb 7 18:01:40 2013 New Revision: 195860 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195860 Log: PR bootstrap/56227 * gg

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-07 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz 2013-02-07 10:15:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Adding some CCs. The two changes about using HOST_LONG_LONG_FORMAT are fine. The use of HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_HEX_PURE in lto/lto.c is indeed wrong. The

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-07 10:07:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > > I don't see anything wrong with the above HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_HEX_PURE > > definition. Does this hints and some MinGW specific problem in type > >

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-07 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at codesourcery dot

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-06 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-02-07 01:48:56 UTC --- On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote: > > The full line is, > > internal_error ("resolution sub id " HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_HEX_PURE > >

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-06 Thread craig.powers at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #7 from Craig Powers 2013-02-06 20:19:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > ../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.c: In function 'void > > lto_resolution_read(spla > > y_tree, FILE*, lto_file*)': >

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-06 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-06 19:40:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > ../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.c: In function 'void > lto_resolution_read(spla > y_tree, FILE*, lto_file*)': > ../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-06 Thread craig.powers at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #5 from Craig Powers 2013-02-06 19:03:10 UTC --- ../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.c: In function 'void lto_resolution_read(spla y_tree, FILE*, lto_file*)': ../../gcc-4.8-20130203/gcc/lto/lto.c:2229:33: error: unknown convers

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-06 Thread craig.powers at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #4 from Craig Powers 2013-02-06 18:54:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > There's another one on line 14622 of gcc/config/i386/i386.c. Doing the same substitution as in ggc-page.c fixes it.

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-06 Thread craig.powers at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #3 from Craig Powers 2013-02-06 18:50:34 UTC --- There's another one on line 14622 of gcc/config/i386/i386.c.

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-06 Thread craig.powers at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #2 from Craig Powers 2013-02-06 18:42:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Created attachment 29374 [details] > proposed patch to use HOST_LONG_LONG_FORMAT > > Please try to bootstrap with the attached patch. That fixes

[Bug bootstrap/56227] Bootstrap failure on MinGW building ggc-page.c

2013-02-06 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56227 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2013-02-06 16:54:49 UTC --- Created attachment 29374 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29374 proposed patch to use HOST_LONG_LONG_FORMAT Please try to bootstrap with the attached patch.