https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
--- Comment #6 from Yves Caniou ---
(In reply to Yves Caniou from comment #5)
> Le mardi 19 novembre 2013 02:36:30 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org a écrit :
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
> >
> > Andrew Pinski changed:
> >
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
--- Comment #5 from Yves Caniou ---
Le mardi 19 novembre 2013 02:36:30 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org a écrit :
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
>
> Andrew Pinski changed:
>
>What|Removed |Adde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
Yves Caniou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yves.can...@ens-lyon.fr
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
--- Comment #2 from Alexey Pavlov 2013-01-09
16:31:18 UTC ---
Do I need add include paths to CXXFLAGS?
But I successfully build gcc-4.6.3 and 4.7.2 without add zlib include path to
CXXFLAGS only to CFLAGS.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |bootstrap
Version|lto