http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55790
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55790
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55790
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2013-01-07 17:39:59
UTC ---
I don't see where att.h or bsd.h is being included. I grep'ed gcc/*.h in the
build tree and source tree and don't see any includes for them. Is it possible
that tm_file is being
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55790
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2013-01-07 17:07:05
UTC ---
The gcc dependencies are reminding me of the pre-egcs days. I hope we don't
return there. :(
Anyway.. These are the sources I have linked into today's gcc-svn. This is what
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55790
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2012-12-31
16:15:11 UTC ---
I've seen this as well at some point - make sure your tree is clean, there
seem to be missing dependencies.
