[Bug bootstrap/53963] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-07-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/53963] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-07-16 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-16 12:35:18 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Jul 16 12:35:10 2012 New Revision: 189528 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189528 Log: Restore type attribute comparison PR mi

[Bug bootstrap/53963] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-07-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW URL|

[Bug bootstrap/53963] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-07-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug bootstrap/53963] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-07-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-14 16:52:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > "--prefix=/usr/local" is the key to trigger this regression. > > The stage 3 compiler is miscompiled. Revision 189349 is OK. > > I don' think so. I have config

[Bug bootstrap/53963] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-07-14 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-07-14 16:46:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > On Linux/x86-64, revision 189467 failed to profiledbootstrap: > > checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in > `/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-te