http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #15 from Michael Matz 2012-05-03 02:32:13
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Thu May 3 02:32:08 2012
New Revision: 187074
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187074
Log:
PR bootstrap/53197
* tree-ssa-dse.c (dse_opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #14 from Michael Matz 2012-05-03 00:13:16
UTC ---
Thanks to Jonathan I have a hunch now. He has BUILD_CONFIG=bootstrap-debug
whereas I have BUILD_CONFIG empty for all my machines.
This means that for him stage2 is built with -g -gto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-03 00:02:26
UTC ---
Created attachment 27294
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27294
auto-host.h on Fedora/15/x86-64
Here is auto-host.h on Fedora/15/x86-64. How does it compare
against you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #12 from Michael Matz 2012-05-02 23:22:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
>
> I'll try binutils 2.22 now.
Doesn't help, still no miscompare :-/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #11 from Michael Matz 2012-05-02 22:53:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > > Are you using binutils 2.22 or newer?
> >
> > No: binutils-2.21.1-60.1.x86_64 .
>
> Please try binutils 2.22.
Even though Jonathan uses 2.20 and also
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-02
22:39:48 UTC ---
Same files:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.o differs
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-02 22:33:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> >
> > Are you using binutils 2.22 or newer?
>
> No: binutils-2.21.1-60.1.x86_64 .
Please try binutils 2.22.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #8 from Michael Matz 2012-05-02 22:29:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> Are you using binutils 2.22 or newer?
No: binutils-2.21.1-60.1.x86_64 .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-02 22:27:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Without help this will be impossible to debug for me. I can't reproduce with
> either x86_64-linux (no configure options), nor under linux32 personality
> (wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Target Milestone|4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #5 from Michael Matz 2012-05-02 22:21:31
UTC ---
Without help this will be impossible to debug for me. I can't reproduce with
either x86_64-linux (no configure options), nor under linux32 personality
(without options and with HJs opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-02
22:17:26 UTC ---
Definitely affects x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu too, my bootstrap failed with this
config:
/home/jwakely/src/gcc/configure --prefix=/home/jwakely/gcc/4.x
--with-system-zlib --with-gnu-l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
16 matches
Mail list logo
