http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #7 from Gary Funck 2011-11-21 02:53:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't libitm be built with the "stage1" g++ as it is a target library,
> > even with --disable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-11-10 17:43:30 UTC ---
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Shouldn't libitm be built with the "stage1" g++ as it is a target library,
> even with --disable-bootstrap?
Y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-11-10
10:42:46 UTC ---
Ah, probably it fails to enable C++ as stage1 language.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-11-10
10:42:15 UTC ---
Shouldn't libitm be built with the "stage1" g++ as it is a target library,
even with --disable-bootstrap?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bg |Build with
|
