http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-04
15:47:50 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Aug 4 15:47:42 2011
New Revision: 177408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177408
Log:
PR target/49964
* config/i386/i386.c (ix8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-04 00:18:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created attachment 24911 [details]
> full patch
>
> Your patch misses several patterns.
>
> This bootstraps, but I don't have an avx cpu locally.
It works:
htt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-03 21:46:22
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created attachment 24911 [details]
> full patch
>
> Your patch misses several patterns.
>
> This bootstraps, but I don't have an avx cpu locally.
I am testing i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24910|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-03 20:51:22
UTC ---
Created attachment 24910
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24910
A patch
I am testing this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson 2011-08-03
19:11:48 UTC ---
It's a bug in the i386 backend:
(call_insn 28 27 136 2 (parallel [
(parallel [
(call (mem:QI (mem/f:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 73 [
__ec$_M_cat_2->_vptr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49964
--- Comment #1 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-08-03
14:28:55 UTC ---
Started from here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-08/msg00051.html
10 matches
Mail list logo