http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #19 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-26
12:27:01 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Jul 26 12:26:58 2011
New Revision: 176789
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176789
Log:
2011-07-26 Martin Jambor
PR bootstrap/49
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-26
12:26:32 UTC ---
Proposed fix posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02247.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-22 17:39:59
UTC ---
It isn't fixed by 176630:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-07/msg00897.html
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-07/msg00403.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-07-21 19:56:59
UTC ---
Forgot to mention that I ran "make -j6 profiledbootstrap".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #15 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-07-21 19:56:28
UTC ---
Martin: I was able to reproduce it by configuring using --with-ld to point to a
newly built version of gold configured with --enable-plugins.
Markus: That patch will fix the probl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-21 13:10:36 UTC ---
H.J. also reported:
lto1: error: caller edge count is negative
in the description. So it's likely the same issue
as in comment #10.
BTW the following already fixes the problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-21
13:00:31 UTC ---
The problem in the summary is a call graph verification error, which
is most likely a duplicate of PR 49796 (an infrastructure/verifier
problem really) while the problem reported in c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-20 17:48:34 UTC ---
And it's indeed caused by the new IPA-CP code (Revision 176424,
commit 821d0e0f73d79232eb827c3988c34d5a1fbeb422).
Reverting the commit "solves" the issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-20
15:47:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Btw, I think we're running into a bug in the new IPA-CP code (see the SPEC 2k6
> LTO build fails HJ also reported). Thus, CCing martin.
I understand this i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-20
15:34:59 UTC ---
I think you need to make sure that a / the linker plugin works. IIRC HJ
uses his own binutils branch and GNU ld.
So in case you are using gold (and configury correctly detects tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-07-20 15:29:58
UTC ---
I'm sorry, I can't see any useful information in that link. It seems to simply
repeat the information that is already in this bug report. Am I missing
something?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-20 14:16:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Is it repeatable for you? I don't know how to investigate this if I can't
> repeat it myself. I also don't see how this could be related to the change to
> build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-07-20 14:11:55
UTC ---
Is it repeatable for you? I don't know how to investigate this if I can't
repeat it myself. I also don't see how this could be related to the change to
building with C++, though o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-20 13:31:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm using an x86_64 Ubuntu Lucid system. I'm using unmodified revision 176479
> of mainline. I used ppl-0.11 and cloog-0.16.2 from
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-07-20 13:25:32
UTC ---
I'm using an x86_64 Ubuntu Lucid system. I'm using unmodified revision 176479
of mainline. I used ppl-0.11 and cloog-0.16.2 from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure. I confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone|---
20 matches
Mail list logo
