https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mon...@monami-software.com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill 2013-05-02 18:55:02
UTC ---
>From Jeff Law:
The problem is that's not the right fix. See this thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00707.html
Basically something needs to avoid buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
--- Comment #5 from DJ Delorie 2013-05-02 17:39:29 UTC
---
I'm OK with it being committed, but it's not up to me, ping Jeff or Kazu.
h8 portJeff Lawl...@redhat.com
h8 portKazu Hiratak...@codesource
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2012-11-02
05:35:18 UTC ---
DJ,
any chances to see your patch from comment#1 be commited?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2012-01-10
07:55:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> See if this helps:
You made my day - Your patch lets building gcc-4.6.2 for --target=h8300-rtems*
succeed (using binutils-2.22).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
DJ Delorie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dj at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from DJ
