--- Comment #6 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 16:51
---
Thanks for checking.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 45105 ***
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-28 16:47 ---
> > Can you please try the latest trunk with the patch in
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg02185.html applied?
>
> This is what I am trying right now. Allow for 45 minutes to have an answer.
At revisi
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-28 16:04 ---
> Can you please try the latest trunk with the patch in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg02185.html applied?
This is what I am trying right now. Allow for 45 minutes to have an answer.
--
http://gc
--- Comment #3 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-28 16:01
---
Can you please try the latest trunk with the patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg02185.html applied?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45104
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-28 15:51 ---
Bootstrap fails also at revision 162600. I also tried revisions 162592 and
162593, but they fails earlier with:
gcc -c -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45104
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-28 13:15 ---
Narrower window: revision 162585 bootstraps, 162601 fails.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45104
