[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-27 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-27 08:44 --- Fixed on trunk. -- ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|N

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-27 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-27 08:14 --- Subject: Bug 44287 Author: ktietz Date: Thu May 27 08:13:58 2010 New Revision: 159912 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159912 Log: gcc/cp/ 2010-05-27 Kai Tietz PR bootstrap/44287

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-26 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-26 23:53 --- *** Bug 44289 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-26 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-26 21:09 --- Created an attachment (id=20757) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20757&action=view) Updated patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44287

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-26 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-26 20:49 --- (In reply to comment #7) Instead of integer_array of course integer_types I meant. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44287

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-26 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-26 20:45 --- Created an attachment (id=20756) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20756&action=view) integer_array can hold now NULL_TREEs for unsupported integer-scalar types integer_array can hold now NULL_TREEs

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-26 20:36 --- A simple testcase: [...@gnu-32 gcc]$ cat /tmp/x.c unsigned long long foo (int signed_flag) { unsigned long long value; value = signed_flag ? 0x7fff : 0x; return value; } [...@gnu-32

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-05-26 20:03 --- I confirm comment #2 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.3.0. The ICE occurs only with -m32 (no need for -O2 -g). The backtrace is: Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS a

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-26 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-26 20:00 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Hmm, is here rtti in use? Could you please test following patch, if it > > solves > > your bootstrap issue? > > > > Kai > > > > Index: gcc/gcc/cp/rtti.c > > =

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-26 19:52 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hmm, is here rtti in use? Could you please test following patch, if it solves > your bootstrap issue? > > Kai > > Index: gcc/gcc/cp/rtti.c > ==

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-26 19:52 --- [...@gnu-32 libgfortran]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/./gcc/xgcc -B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/./gcc/ -B/usr/gcc-4.6.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/gcc-4.6.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug bootstrap/44287] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2010-05-26 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-26 19:49 --- Hmm, is here rtti in use? Could you please test following patch, if it solves your bootstrap issue? Kai Index: gcc/gcc/cp/rtti.c === --- gcc.orig/gcc/c