[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gnugcc at marino dot st --- Comment #26

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominik.vogt at gmx dot de --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 Cody Schafer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmesmon at gmail dot com --- Comment #23 f

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 --- Comment #22 from Cody Schafer 2012-08-29 23:47:24 UTC --- Created attachment 28102 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28102 gcc-fix-multib-hostargs.patch This patch fixes the bug by only adding --*-multilib options to basear

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 Alexandre Pereira Nunes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexandre.nunes at gmail

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 --- Comment #20 from Pawel Sikora 2010-11-21 08:41:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > what's the current status of the --{dis/en}able-multilib switches? > > As far as I know that of from before this PR: enabled

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 --- Comment #19 from Ralf Wildenhues 2010-11-21 08:28:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > what's the current status of the --{dis/en}able-multilib switches? As far as I know that of from before this PR: enabled multilib is the default (if you

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 Pawel Sikora changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|| --- Comment #18 from Pawel Sikora 2010-1

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

-- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #17 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 16:32 --- Subject: Bug 43328 Author: rwild Date: Thu Apr 1 16:32:38 2010 New Revision: 157916 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157916 Log: /: PR bootstrap/43615 PR bootstrap/43328

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 13:17 --- Fixed? But caused PR43615. --disable-multilib no longer works. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #15 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 05:44 --- Subject: Bug 43328 Author: rwild Date: Wed Mar 31 05:44:30 2010 New Revision: 157851 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157851 Log: Fix toplevel configure --enable-multilib handling. /: P

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #14 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 07:56 --- Patch at . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #13 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-12 18:10 --- BTW, the actual bug is that, if --enable-multilib is passed explicitly, it will wrongly propagate to build_configargs and host_configargs and not only to target_configargs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #12 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-12 18:09 --- Thanks. I can reproduce a spurious toplevel-build/32/zlib directory when --enable-multilib is passed explicitly to toplevel configure. Workaround is to not pass --enable-multilib, multilibs are enabled by default.

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #11 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-03-11 19:33 --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Did you 'rm -rf ~/src/gcc/trunk' and create that directory anew? > > > > no, what for? svn status reports no unversioned files in trunk

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #10 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-03-11 19:29 --- Created an attachment (id=20089) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20089&action=view) build script. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #9 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-03-11 19:28 --- Created an attachment (id=20087) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20087&action=view) build log for very very clean source tree. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #8 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-11 18:33 --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Did you 'rm -rf ~/src/gcc/trunk' and create that directory anew? > > no, what for? svn status reports no unversioned files in trunk directory. Please allow me t

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #7 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-03-11 18:21 --- (In reply to comment #6) > > no, what for? svn status reports no unversioned files in trunk > > directory. > > Svn status does not report .o files normally. my ~/.subversion/config has custom global-ignores and i know wha

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 18:15 --- Subject: Re: multilib bootstrap broken. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:11 AM, "pluto at agmk dot net" wrote: > > > --- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-03-11 18:11 > --- > (In reply

Re: [Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

Sent from my iPhone On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:11 AM, "pluto at agmk dot net" > wrote: --- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-03-11 18:11 --- (In reply to comment #4) Did you 'rm -rf ~/src/gcc/trunk' and create that directory anew? no, what for? svn status reports no unv

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-03-11 18:11 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Did you 'rm -rf ~/src/gcc/trunk' and create that directory anew? no, what for? svn status reports no unversioned files in trunk directory. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #4 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-11 16:06 --- Did you 'rm -rf ~/src/gcc/trunk' and create that directory anew? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-03-11 16:02 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Quoting install.texi: > > First, we @strong{highly} recommend that GCC be built into a > separate directory from the sources which does @strong{not} reside > within the source tree. This is how we

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-11 15:46 --- Quoting install.texi: First, we @strong{highly} recommend that GCC be built into a separate directory from the sources which does @strong{not} reside within the source tree. This is how we generally build GCC; buildi

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-10 22:37 --- I did a bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu at revision 157328. zlib here is a host library which means it does not need to be multilibed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328