--- Comment #20 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-07-05
23:47 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > As Dave suggests in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455#c13,
> > this
> > is fixed,
> >
>
> I tried it yesterday, after updating
--- Comment #19 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-07-05 23:44 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> As Dave suggests in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455#c13,
> this
> is fixed,
>
I tried it yesterday, after updating with SVN and updating my 1.7 cygwin, and
got the same
--- Comment #18 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-07-05
17:24 ---
As Dave suggests in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455#c13, this
is fixed,
--
christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #17 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-07-04
23:55 ---
It is beta, yeah. But it's a damn good beta :) Can't promise you won't
stumble across a new bug or two, but it's reliable enough for fairly heavy-duty
everyday usage.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 23:52
---
I was resisting the change to 1.7 because the website states "Beta".
I will go ahead and do so now. :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #15 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-07-04
23:27 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I am on cygwin-1.5. will these fixes get pushed to setup? or am I stuck? or
> is
> there a work around?
Hi Jerry,
I can't answer that question. There is a new binutils
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 21:29
---
I am on cygwin-1.5. will these fixes get pushed to setup? or am I stuck? or is
there a work around?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #13 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-07-04
15:48 ---
This should all be resolved by the fixes applied in the past few days to
binutils CVS HEAD.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #12 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-06-30 21:09 ---
I see this too, as of today's SVN.
$ alias CONFIGURECVS
alias CONFIGURECVS='/cygdrive/e/Home/cvsroot/gcc/configure --verbose
--enable-threads --disable-nls --enable-checking=release
--enable-concept-checks
--- Comment #11 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-24
13:03 ---
I have tried binutils cvs checkouts as of
20090608 12:00 UTC
20090519 12:00 UTC
20090502 12:00 UTC
20090402 12:00 UTC
20090309 12:00 UTC
as well as cygwin's provided binutils 2.18.50.20080625, all with
--- Comment #10 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-24
05:56 ---
Backing out gcc commit r148408 from gcc trunk , using binutils 2.19.51.20090623
cvs checkout (03:52:32 UTC 2009), for r148850, gets bootstrap to complete.
Testresults posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-te
--- Comment #9 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-22
17:37 ---
The PR was reported using a local build of binutils' daily snapshot of
20090609, and all comments from me was using that version of binutils.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #8 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-22
17:22 ---
Might be related to http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-06/msg00370.html ...
If I strip the here attached a.exe, I get a file that indeed runs...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #7 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-22
08:29 ---
still there as of revision 148777. The bootstrap failure occurs also when
configuring like this:
../gcc/configure --enable-threads=posix --enable-libgcj
--disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-system-zlib --enabl
--- Comment #6 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=18010)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18010&action=view)
a.o: generated with --save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #5 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=18009)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18009&action=view)
a.s: generated with --save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=18008)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18008&action=view)
a.i: generated with --save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #3 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=18007)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18007&action=view)
a.exe generated
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #2 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
12:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=18006)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18006&action=view)
a.c: from conftest in intl
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455
--- Comment #1 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-06-16
11:26 ---
Could you re-run that with --save-temps, and attach the .i, .s, .o and .exe
files to the PR please?
--
dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
20 matches
Mail list logo
