--- Comment #11 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-06 21:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=17264)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17264&action=view)
preprocessed source code of ice3.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981
--- Comment #10 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-06 21:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=17263)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17263&action=view)
reduced program which reproduces the ICE
Attaching a reduced test case which reproduces the same error.
> gcc -c i
--- Comment #9 from grxnprzn at gmx dot net 2009-02-06 19:04 ---
If someone is working on this, you might want to look at #37798, too. I have no
idea wether these two are connected, but GCC definitively has problems with
alignment on SPARC.
--
grxnprzn at gmx dot net changed:
--- Comment #8 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 13:51 ---
I would like to confirm that, even after recompiling gcc with bison, I am still
getting the internal compiler error. There is no yacc, no /usr/ccs/bin in $PATH
when gcc was compiled.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #7 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 02:00 ---
I can't believe I am so dense... I installed bison, removed /usr/ccs/bin from
the PATH. But I forgot to recompile gcc with the new update. I was still trying
to bootstrap from the old compiler. Let me recompile gcc (with
--- Comment #6 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 01:20 ---
Is there anyway to figure out if my gcc is still using yacc and not bison?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981
--- Comment #5 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 01:14 ---
My initial guess was that it is a bug in yacc. But now I do not think so. I
have compiled bison (which supersedes yacc). I still see this bug with bison
(and no yacc).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 01:08 ---
So if I am reading this thread correctly this is really a bug in Solaris's
yacc?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981
