--- Comment #6 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-08-13 14:23 ---
Is 2.95 still the minimum gcc required for the build?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37086
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-08-12 14:00 ---
Subject: Re: Cross-compilers built with GCC 3.4 do not
work
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> As this is a bug in GCC 3.4 let's close this as invalid (can't we do a
> C only host bootst
--- Comment #4 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 11:55 ---
In the past, we've worked around bugs like this in widely used compilers - they
make life difficult. Obviously it depends how nasty a workaround is found!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37086
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 08:42 ---
*** Bug 37091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 08:41 ---
As this is a bug in GCC 3.4 let's close this as invalid (can't we do a
C only host bootstrap for building cross-compilers to work around issues
with host compilers?)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-08-11 22:19 ---
Subject: Re: New: Cross-compilers built with GCC 3.4
do not work
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, drow at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Joseph suggests this came in at the time of the tuples merge. If possible, it
> would b
