[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2010-12-08 Thread bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531 bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Res

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2010-12-07 Thread gseanmcg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531 Sean McGovern changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com --- Comment #13

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2009-07-01 Thread bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
--- Comment #12 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us 2009-07-01 16:42 --- It seems that bugs gradually get fixed. I am successfully using GCC 4.3.3 on the same system configure like: /home/bfriesen/src/gnu/gcc-4.3.3/configure LDFLAGS='-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib' --p

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2009-07-01 Thread marek dot rouchal at infineon dot com
--- Comment #11 from marek dot rouchal at infineon dot com 2009-07-01 11:58 --- (In reply to comment #2) > and did get farther, but the final link fails like > ... > ld: fatal: unwind table: file > /home/bfriesen/build/gcc-4.3.0/./gcc/amd64/crtend.o: section .eh_frame: bad > cie > vers

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2008-07-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-19 21:32 --- *** Bug 36878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2008-03-11 Thread bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
--- Comment #9 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us 2008-03-11 16:35 --- A documentation update will be suffient provided that binutils 'ld' adequately supports Solaris now. However, I notice that there are may be some issues with code built/linked with the Sun linker and t

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2008-03-11 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-11 16:20 --- (In reply to comment #7) > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#ix86-x-solaris210 > > It is recommended that you configure GCC to use the GNU assembler in > /usr/sfw/bin/gas but the Sun linker, using the options --wit

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2008-03-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-11 15:53 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#ix86-x-solaris210 It is recommended that you configure GCC to use the GNU assembler in /usr/sfw/bin/gas but the Sun linker, using the options --with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/sfw

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2008-03-11 Thread bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
--- Comment #6 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us 2008-03-11 15:51 --- The previous GCC releases worked "out of the box" but 4.3.0 does not. Give this, how can this bug report be "invalid"? The configuration for Solaris 10 on x86 hardware has clearly degraded as compared

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2008-03-11 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-11 11:17 --- Any way, it is not gcc that fails here. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2008-03-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-10 23:20 --- I always hear the opposite way around, that is the Sun's assembler and linker are not that good. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2008-03-10 Thread bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
--- Comment #3 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us 2008-03-10 23:05 --- By using 'as' and 'ld' from binutils-2.18, I have achieved a successful compile. Using gas and the system linker was not sufficient since it resulted in the same error. Based on past experience, I don

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2008-03-10 Thread bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
--- Comment #2 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us 2008-03-10 21:49 --- It seems (according to gcc -v) that GCC 4.2.1 re-configured itself to use: /scratch/bfriesen/build/gcc-4.2.1/configure --program-suffix=-4.2.1 --enable-shared --enable-threads --enable-version-specific

[Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc

2008-03-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-10 21:22 --- I think even Sun recommends you use the GNU Assembler for x86_64 Solaris. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---