--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 15:30 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I close this bug as "WONTFIX" because there's no active cygwin maintainer for
> libjava. So, if it's not fixed already, it probably won't be fixed anyway.
> I just once tested it for fun :-)
>
--- Comment #3 from mtrudel at gmx dot ch 2007-03-09 14:05 ---
I close this bug as "WONTFIX" because there's no active cygwin maintainer for
libjava. So, if it's not fixed already, it probably won't be fixed anyway.
I just once tested it for fun :-)
--
mtrudel at gmx dot ch changed:
