--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20 19:15 ---
ok, I'm closing.
Please reopen if it is still a problem.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #7 from sgilbertson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20 18:45
---
I checked out revision 117082 (trunk) and successfully built a few static
binaries with it. So unless Thomas saw a different problem than I did, I'd say
it's fixed.
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-14 23:19 ---
I think the PR 13212 fix probably fixed this on svn trunk.
Can one of you try that?
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from sgilbertson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 15:33
---
The "ugly workaround" (which works great for my static builds!) patches a
previous workaround:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q1/msg00181.html
So this issue is related to #13212,which is assigned to Bry
--- Comment #4 from aeby at graeff dot com 2006-08-17 19:43 ---
A bug tracker is not the right place to discuss philosophy questions, so if
you'd like to continue the discussion, we should move over to e-mail or the gcj
mailing list (lookout for subject: "GCJ 4.1.1 and static linking - S
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 16:18 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Why are you trying to static link java code? It will almost not work for
> other
> cases.
>
We have 7.5X10^6 lines of code in about 800 classes that run fine statically
linked. So it doe
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 15:12 ---
Why are you trying to static link java code? It will almost not work for other
cases.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28760
--- Comment #1 from aeby at graeff dot com 2006-08-17 11:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=12087)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12087&action=view)
Ugly workaround GC_PTHREAD_CREATE_NAME segfault
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28760
