https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to pmatos from comment #11)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #10)
> > Should be fixed by the above commit.
>
> David, does this mean the analyzer has C++ support now or just that this
> s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
--- Comment #11 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #10)
> Should be fixed by the above commit.
David, does this mean the analyzer has C++ support now or just that this
specific bug is fixed in-tree?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91f993b7e31ce85676148dca180bc0d827d4245e
commit r10-6590-g91f993b7e31ce85676148dca180bc0d827d4245e
Author: David Malcolm
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35e24106fc1b782e70f8339e0a1321a2bc7a7f15
commit r10-6588-g35e24106fc1b782e70f8339e0a1321a2bc7a7f15
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from David Malco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> > Marking status as SUSPENDED for now and setting Target Milestone to 11 (in
> > the hope of adding c++ support to th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> Marking status as SUSPENDED for now and setting Target Milestone to 11 (in
> the hope of adding c++ support to the analyzer in gcc 11).
Can't we call a sorry func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
--- Comment #2 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> Note that C++ is out-of-scope for the analyzer for GCC 10.
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x01cb37ed in supergraph
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93288
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Note that C++ is out-of-scope for the analyzer for GCC 10.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x01cb37ed in supergraph::supergraph (this=0x7fffcda0, logger=0x0)
at ../../src
14 matches
Mail list logo
