--- Comment #9 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 13:21 ---
Fixed for 4.6.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #8 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 13:18 ---
Subject: Bug 45499
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Sep 3 13:17:46 2010
New Revision: 163817
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163817
Log:
PR ada/45499
* gcc-interface/misc.c (gnat_init_op
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-09-03 11:38 ---
Subject: Re: Ada bootstrap broken
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> I think for -D and -U at least the canonicalization should be joined instead
> of
> separate, because that's how people
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-09-03 11:17 ---
Subject: Re: Ada bootstrap broken
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Subject: Re: Ada bootstrap broken
> >
> > I don't see where a -Y option would come from
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 07:30 ---
I think for -D and -U at least the canonicalization should be joined instead of
separate, because that's how people are used to write these options (which
doesn't mean the tools the driver invokes shouldn't be changed
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-03 02:39 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Subject: Re: Ada bootstrap broken
>
> I don't see where a -Y option would come from or what would accept it.
Y can be any letter from A to Z and a to z. See PR 45504 for an example.
--
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-09-03 00:25 ---
Subject: Re: Ada bootstrap broken
I don't see where a -Y option would come from or what would accept it.
I can see an issue with some Ada code not accepting the separate arguments
"-I -". I'm testing a workaroun
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-02 23:32 ---
GCC driver now passes down '-Y XXX=FOO" instead of "-YXXX=FOO".
Ada compiler may not support it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45499
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 21:47 ---
I guess this is related to the recent option handling changes. At least, it
worked fine yesterday and doesn't work today (I only see a-strunb.ads issues
myself).
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
